Monday, June 8, 2009

LEADING PROFESSIONAL FIRMS DURING DOWNTURNS

Leadership is never more critical than when a firm hits a major downturn in its business. There was a lengthy article in Sunday's NY Times on the large global law firm, White & Case. It is a scenario that is playing out across the globe at many law firms and other professional firms.

The Leaders of these firms must now act like crisis managers. This is very difficult for the leaders to do. They generally have spent a couple of decades at the firm. They have strong views of the firm's strengths and weaknesses that may prevent them from taking the right steps. They also have strong relationships and beliefs regarding the partners and staff that may prevent them from taking the necessary steps. Furthermore, the firm's accounting systems may produce information that clouds the true profitability of each department and of each partner.

It is actually critical at this stage for these Leaders to retain the services of an outside troubled company expert to objectively and critically analyze the operations. Professional firms grow on the assumption that they will continue to grow and be profitable. Sometimes the revenue recognition and expense allocation is not a true reflection of profit and loss of a service line or an office. And sometimes there are sacred cows that insiders don't question.

Several years ago, I worked with a global professional services firm that was being sold. The London Office of the firm was entertaining offers from other firms. One week the London Office was in our deal, the next week it was out of the deal. And so it went for several weeks. Finally during one of the weeks that the London Office was out of the deal, I finally analyzed the true profitability of the London Office. It didn't make a profit. In fact, as far as I could tell, it had never made a profit.

I met with the global leader and said, "why do we want the London Office? It has never been profitable." The global leader replied, "We are a global firm, we must have a London Office!"
To which I replied, "Thank God we only have one London Office, if we had more we would be out of business!!"

The global leader finally let the London Office go to another deal. Only an objective party could make a recommendation to let the London Office of a global firm go away if it wasn't profitable.

Now when a professional firm is in a significant downturn, the Leaders should hire a professional restructuring advisor. But like the shoe cobbler whose kids have no shoes, it is almost impossible for a professional services firm to hire a professional restructuring advisor. How ironic.

Cheers, Mike

2 comments:

  1. As a consultant that was employed at two different global management consulting firms that disappeared in crisis, I can argue (and agree) that many of the problems stemmed from the fact the shoe cobbler's kids had no shoes.

    Therefore, how important do you think it is for firms to not just talk the talk, but also walk the walk? To me that is more critical than the focus on specific profitability.

    stay adventurous,
    Craig

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah Craig, once again you have captured the essence of the issue. It is critical for firm leaders to walk the walk. It gives them credibility with their followers who can always see when the Emperor has no clothes.

    Reminds me of the IT consulting firm that couldn't put in a new financial system for themselves....

    Cheers, Mike

    ReplyDelete